Divorce and the Mortgage

Many divorces are in a rut due to the mortgage on the marital home.  When that home is worth less than what it takes to pay off the mortgage, no one typically is interested in taking on that debt.  Refinancing the mortgage can also be a dead end.  Additionally, a sad sense of optimism sometimes hovers over the house that it might regain its value with a little more patience.  A little more patience for some couples has turned into years and a rut a mile wide.

For some couples, the issue is one where there may be a silver lining, if there is a little research done.  Some mortgages will qualify for refinancing that may have been thought to be a lost cause.  Take a look here for one such solution.

I’ve Heard that Divorce Mediation is Cheaper than an Attorney…Check the Fine Print

Is divorce mediation cheaper than divorce litigation?  There is research and other commentary  that suggests that mediation is cheaper, but the common consumer should be aware of the fine print.

Fine Print One:  Mediation doesn’t guarantee an agreement.  You could pay for mediation and, if no agreement is reached, still have to move forward with litigation.

Fine Print Two:  Mediation works when both parties in divorce are reasonable.  If one or both spouses cannot control their emotions, making the business-decisions of divorce and the self-less decisions of parenthood may simply be impossible.

Fine Print Three:  Mediators will not serve as your attorney.   If you have a legal question, you should ask an attorney and not the mediator.  Many individuals are unaware that you can use an attorney for counseling (short sessions for specific legal information and advice), litigation (to represent you in all aspects of litigation), and for finite projects (to draft a parenting plan, file the uncontested divorce paperwork, represent you at the mediation only, write a will, etc.).  If you arrive at mediation without knowing the legal landscape, you will have arrived unprepared.   If you are trying to undercut or minimize legal fees, then use a lawyer wisely and then you may be able to use mediation wisely, too.

 

 

 

E-Discovery Disputes in Employment Matters

KPMG has been ordered to preserve the hard-drives of many perhaps “similarly situated” auditors, not just the hard-drives of the two auditors suing them, in an underpayment of wages case in New York.   It may be time to either mediate the e-discovery matter (see list of qualified E-Neutrals) in this two-party case that apparently has class-action exposure!

Retaliation Claims: The Interesting Statistics

Janice Harper, an anthropologist, recently published an article that highlights several interesting statistics uncovered by the Ethics Resource Center about Whistleblower claims.

One stat of interest is the fact that 39% of whistleblowers’ initial complaints were not investigated by the employer.  That stat, when taken together with retaliatory conduct towards the whistleblower, suggests that perhaps a reason for the employer’s lack of concern and action was precisely due to the fact that it already knew the complaint was legitimate and true, but an undesirable truth.  Hence, the effort to avoid the reality and to sweep it under the rug.

The proliferation of employment laws over the past twenty years have begun to automatically come with anti-retaliation provisions in them.  Indeed, in the civil rights context, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s statistics demonstrate significant increases in the filing of retaliation charges by employees.  This trend is evident in other contexts, as well.

The rise of retaliation claims has resulted in some employers taking employee complaints more seriously and taking the additional time to review them, even those they believe are entirely contrived.  The reason?   There are many, but some of the more common reasons include the attempt by employers to identify problems early and fix them before matters escalate to litigation and the attempt to create a demonstrable pattern of taking issues seriously (rather than appearing to be the broom-wielding employer that sweeps concerns under the rug).

Due to this trend, employers have begun cross training their in-house counsel, risk managers, and HR professionals to conduct proper investigations of employee concerns and complaints.  Additionally, external workplace investigators have also become more common, the recent creation of the Association of Workplace Investigators is an indicator of this growing industry.

In Georgia, employers typically turn to attorneys as external investigators into workplace complaints.  These attorneys, some of whom have joined One Mediation, are well qualified in being able to quickly respond to an employee’s concerns in an impartial and well-documented and reasoned fashion.   The use of independent workplace investigators with employee concerns and complaints has gained increasing acceptance as a justifiable business expense for a variety of reasons that go well beyond litigation concerns and extend to increased morale, retention of skilled employees, and economic growth potential.

 

 

Employment Lawsuits: When they are bad, they are really bad.

Employment lawsuits often involve matters such as pay and wrongful terminations.   But some suits are much more compelling than others…even making the Headlines.  Case in point:  Skechers.

Employers sometimes learn the hard way that personalizing a termination can create a slew of bad press and viable legal claims.  What attorney would not want the case where the big-bad-employer appears to pick on the employee even after it’s kicked the employee to the curb?   Those “insult-to-injury” claims are the cases that can really tick off a jury!

With Skechers, the allegations appear to be that it terminated a marketing executive for “allowing” a recently departed employee purchase Skecher shoes with an “employee discount.”   The sin appears to be that the former exec either knew about the post-employment purchase or should have known about it.  As a result, the exec received her pink slip.

One can only imagine what a true audit on the usage of the employee discount would demonstrate…

In any event, the “insult to injury” was that when the exec landed a new job, her reference at Skechers threw her under the bus.  The new job evaporated.

While Skechers may have told the new employer the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, holding its tongue arguably would have been a far more prudent path.  Indeed, many employers have policies that forbid the provision of references or any other information beyond “dates of employment and last job title.”   The reason:  less liability risk.

With the expansion of whistleblower protections, employers must either train its employees on the ramifications of providing opinion-based statements that could be later used as evidence of retaliation by even a former employee.  Some of these anti-retaliation provisions in workplace laws are not only permitting liability to accrue against the employer, but also are permitting individual liability against the “speaker.”

Silence, often, is golden.

Post-Holiday Divorces…Just Get Me Through the Holidays, And Then….

Family Lawyers will tell you that their practices typically will slow down (except emergency matters) around the last two weeks of December.  However, they come roaring to life in January.   The theory goes that many folks who are in trying family circumstances will try to “make it through” the holidays before getting serious with legal processes, making their decision to leave a spouse known, or otherwise create more trying or contentious circumstances.

Despite the feigned peace over the holidays, planning, stewing, and emotional roller coasters continue.

As to the planning, getting as much information as possible about the separation and divorce process in your state and getting as much information about your own family (more about this in a minute) is a critical step…often one that should be done before jumping into full-fledged litigation.

“Two Suggestions” for divorce planning:

First, consult (only consult) with an attorney or a divorce mediator in your town about the process, timeline, and cost.  For a taste of what information you might receive or inquire about, click here.

Second, review these inventory forms for getting organized regarding “the financials.”   The benefit of being organized early cannot be overstated.  Cannot. Be. Overstated.

 

 

 

Investigations in the Face of Whistleblower and Retaliation Concerns

Laws are proliferating that specifically forbid retaliation against employees who raise certain workplace concerns (often in certain ways) to their employers.   Perhaps these protections are overdue in some instances, but legislators are more often than not recognizing that employers can chill the willingness of employees, the very people who would know, to raise concerns about how a business is run, how individuals perform their duties, etc.  to the employer itself or even to an enforcement agency.

In this climate, employers are starting to look for proactive and “early detection” processes to solve problems before they arise.  However, even in encouraging employees to speak up, employers still hold concerns about being accused of retaliation by the complaining or reporting employee.

In some instances, these competing interests of wanting to nip problems in the bud while also trying to minimize the likelihood of a retaliation claim, employers are turning more to external investigators.   When an employer does utilize an external investigator, there is a stronger likelihood that the process will be viewed as being fair (though it may be imperfect), that the information uncovered and the conclusions reached were impartial, and that concerns about retaliation should decrease.

Employers and legal counsel should be aware of anti-retaliation provisions that affect the employer and be prepared to call on an external investigator, such as those at One Mediation, when personnel matters are raised.  Getting it right the first time can do wonders for morale, compliance, and long-term legal expenses related to litigation.

 

Mediation as an Employee Benefit

Apparently, One Mediation isn’t the only entity to tout the benefits of mediation…as an employee benefit.  While many employers are beginning to look at establishing internal conflict resolution programs using a mediator (or other third party), other employers are recognizing that their employees need greater access to resources and tools that can assist with resolution to issues and problems in their lives that bleed into the workplace or cause presenteeism/absenteeism.

One Mediation offers an option for employers to provide discounted mediation services to its employees as a benefit of employment.  Through this Family Matters Program, employees can gain greater access to mediators for family related matters:  divorce, child custody and support, parenting plans, modifications to child-related matters, elder law, long-term care/caregiving matters, and more.

Call One Mediation (404-720-0599) for more information and the latest version of the Program offering.

Mediation Operates for Opera Dispute

Labor talks have utilized mediation and arbitration for decades.  Professional athletes and professional artists, even opera singers, have used these processes to get at the problem of compensation, work conditions, and more.

However, the use of mediation and arbitration in non-union workplaces on these same issues in a “pre-litigation” phase has not had the same degree of traction.  Why?

Perhaps the cost.  Perhaps the suggestion that an employer is “not in charge.”  Perhaps the protections that now exist under federal law (and in many states).  Perhaps the thought that only litigation will create necessary change.

Whatever the reason, non-union workforces and their employers may be missing great opportunities to nip issues in the bud.

Mediation and Divorce: Hope for Reducing Costly Legal Battles in Canada

The trend towards requiring mediation in legal disputes has become the focus of legislation in Canada.  There, legislation is proposed to help families in divorce avoid costly legal bills and to reduce the judicial caseload.  With the prevalence of divorce and its high emotions, mediation is a means to address productively some of the stumbling blocks to resolution that often create incentives or circumstances that lead to long and expensive legal disputes.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers